- Legal News Updates
- Law Center
- Legal Business
- Court News Center
- Law Firm News
- Legal Interviews
- Headline News
- Political and Legal
- Practice Focuses
- Legal Spotlight
- Events & Seminars
- Legal Marketing
- Court Watch
- Immigration Law
- Media Center
- Justice Stories
- GOP to take new congressional map to court
- Inmate in landmark Supreme Court case denied parole
- Catalan politicians in Spanish court in secession probe
- Supreme Court blocks some redrawn North Carolina districts
- Court allows Pennsylvania to redraw GOP-favored district map
- Court rules that Kushner firm must disclose partners' names
- Court rules Puigdemont must return to Spain for re-election
- Analysis: Outside groups may factor in Arkansas court race
- Pennsylvania GOP take gerrymandering case to US high court
- Top Pakistani court orders arrest of escaped police officer
Q: Can the U.S. Supreme Court reduce the $2.5 billion punitive damages award?
Yes. During the oral argument, the court focused almost entirely on whether punitive damages are permissible under maritime law and if so, whether the $2.5 billion award was excessive.
If the court finds that punitive damage awards are permissible, then the amount is at issue. Maritime law is a unique area of federal common law, or judge-made law. In this respect, the Supreme Court has the authority to set standards that could limit punitive damages awards in the maritime law context as it has done with punitive damage awards challenged under constitutional due process.
Q: Why might the Supreme Court justices reduce the punitive damage award?
In the last decade the Supreme Court has endeavored to set limits on punitive damages under the premise that excessive damages violate constitutional due process.’a0
During the years where this case bounced back and forth between the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco and the District Court of Alaska, this was the main issue and ultimately the basis for which the 9th Circuit cut the award.
Now the Supreme Court is looking at the excessiveness of punitive damage awards under the lens of maritime law.
Since this area of maritime law has not really been touched for nearly 200 years, it is unclear whether a different standard should be applied. If in fact, there is a "different standard" it may or may not be more stringent than the constitutional standard. The result could reduce the award. This is what the justices must decide.’a0
Q: Will the Supreme Court reach a decision before June?
Yes. There is always a possibility that a decision will be delivered at some point before the summer recess deadline at the end of June. This largely depends on the complexity of the case and how long it takes for all of the justices to approve the final written opinion.
Legal News Media
Legal News Organization press is the top headline legal news provider for lawyers and legalprofessionals. Read law articles and breaking news from law firm's across the United States to get the latest updates. The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Legal News Media as a service to the internet
community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.