Court Questions Money Laundering Cases

Justice Stories Posted on

The Supreme Court suggested Monday the federal government may be stretching the anti-money laundering law too far in prosecutions of small-time criminals.

A lawyer for the Bush administration ran into aggressive questioning by justices who wondered why the mere concealment of cash in a car headed for Mexico meets the standard for an international money laundering charge, which carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison.

"All you have here" is transporting cash and concealing it, complained Justice Antonin Scalia.

A person who prevents detection of illegal proceeds "is exactly what Congress had in mind" when it passed the law, replied Lisa Schertler of the Justice Department solicitor general's office.

It is the second such case the court has heard this term.

Four months ago, the justices expressed other concerns with the government's use of the money laundering law in a gambling case. That case is still pending.

When Congress cracked down on the crime of money laundering in 1986, it had two problems in mind: drug cartels and organized crime. The law makes it a crime to transport money across the border when it is designed to conceal the source, ownership or control of the funds.

Legal News Media

Legal News Organization press is the top headline legal news provider for lawyers and legalprofessionals. Read law articles and breaking news from law firm's across the United States to get the latest updates. The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Legal News Media as a service to the internet
community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.


American Bar Association – Start and Run a Law Firm – Starting a Law Firm

Lawyer Web Direct

CPA Website Designs